Subscription Status

Supporting Member : No
Pro Supp. Member : No

Join & Become a Member
Supporting Memberships

Our Local Sponsors

Forum Links

  2. CT Shooting Range Info
  3. CT Gun Shops

Like & Follow us on :

Author Topic: Republican State Sen. Pushing Gun Confiscation Law in Oregon  (Read 212 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline IamJohninCT

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2017
  • Posts: 205
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • PROTECT the 2nd!
  • Referrals: 0
Republican State Sen. Pushing Gun Confiscation Law in Oregon
« on: April 19, 2017, 06:06:56 AM »

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Republican State Sen. Pushing Gun Confiscation Law in Oregon
by AWR Hawkins18 Apr 2017

Oregon state Sen. Brian Boquist (R-Dallas) is pushing a confiscation bill that would broaden the number of prohibited gun purchasers as well as require certain individuals “to hand over any guns in their possession.”
Boquist’s stepson was a Navy Veteran who committed suicide annd he is now pushing gun control for other Oregon residents.
According to Oregon Live, Boquist’s bill “would enable immediate family members to obtain a court order to prevent a person showing signs of wanting to commit suicide or hurt others from obtaining a gun for a year.” It would also require the person to surrender all guns in their possession once the order was issued.
Gun rights supporters filed into the state capitol Monday to denounce Boquist’s push as a violation of constitutional rights. Boquist responded by waving a small, book-sized copy of the constitution and saying, “It’s easy to wave your book around.” Boquist then suggested his legislation–Senate Bill 868–is constitutional. He said, “When the Supreme Court and other people say it’s constitutional, that’s the law of the land.”
It is important to note that Boquist’s bill allows for ex parte hearings for gun confiscation. In such cases, the petitioner would ask for a confiscation order and that order could be issued without the gun owner being present. The bill says the subject of the order “[has] the right to request one hearing to terminate [the] order during the 12 months that [the] order is in effect starting from the date of [the] order.”
Keely Hopkins works with the NRA and explained that Boquist’s bill is yet another piece of legislation that violates the due process rights of Americans. Hopkins said, “This bill allows for a protective order to remove your Second Amendment rights, not because of a criminal conviction, but based on third-party allegations using an evidentiary standard that falls far below what’s normally required for the removing of fundamental rights.”
SB 868 is co-sponsored by state Sen. Ginny Burdick (D-Portland) and is supported by Gabby Giffords’ gun control group, Americans for Responsible Solutions.

AWR Hawkins is the Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and host of Bullets with AWR Hawkins, a Breitbart News podcast. He is also the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.

Online JimK

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2014
  • Posts: 149
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • It's not gun control. It's citizen control.
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Republican State Sen. Pushing Gun Confiscation Law in Oregon
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2017, 07:28:28 AM »
So I guess he's not calling for any changes to the fourth amendment.  :wall:
The 2nd Amendment: When they tell you that you don't need it, that's when you really need it.

Online 2ndamendment45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Highly Active Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1403
  • Thanked: 6 times
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Republican State Sen. Pushing Gun Confiscation Law in Oregon
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2017, 09:47:55 AM »
yet, another emotional reaction to a tragedy (understable for just a short time until the grey matter in the brain wakes up).  However, this "republican" is in Oregon where people relocate to because California is too conservative for them.