Get Adobe Flash player

Get Adobe Flash player

« previous next »
  Go Down

Author Topic: Safety selector Markings question?  (Read 189 times)

Offline sikocycles

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 175
  • Keep the 2nd Amendment Alive.
Safety selector Markings question?
« on: February 16, 2012, 09:14:17 PM »
Any weird CT laws? Can it be pictograms? Or does it have to be text Safe Fire?
Safe Zombies?
Logged

Online DINK

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Highly Active Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 690
  • Keep the 2nd Amendment Alive.
Re: Safety selector Markings question?
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2012, 08:05:38 AM »
Nope, nothing in CT law (so far).

Please don't give them any bright ideas.  The legislature IS in session.  :-\
Logged

Online SPOProds-Sean O.

  • Trade Count: (19)
  • Highly Active Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 1562
  • Country: us
  • Got the hardware. Working on the software.
    • SPO Tactical Defense
Re: Safety selector Markings question?
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2012, 08:27:37 AM »
Shoot, you could have a beer and a glass slipper engraved on it as long as it passes the CT AWB.
Logged
"OCing with no active retention is unwise a.k.a. STUPID!"
"Hardware breaks, software doesn't, unless your brain runs on Windows."

Offline MadSmith

  • Supporting Vendor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Highly Active Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 1364
  • Country: us
  • Praise The Lord And Pass The Ammunition!
Re: Safety selector Markings question?
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2012, 08:42:53 AM »
There are, of course, logical limits to that as well.  For example, obscene pictures might get you in trouble at a range where there are children around.   :)
Logged
The Freedom Shoppe
07 FLL, Firearms, Sales, Manufacturing, Transfers, Layaways, Exchanges, Consignments, Gunsmithing, Customization, Prototyping
25 Old State Road, New Milford, CT (860)350-3502

Online SPOProds-Sean O.

  • Trade Count: (19)
  • Highly Active Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 1562
  • Country: us
  • Got the hardware. Working on the software.
    • SPO Tactical Defense
Re: Safety selector Markings question?
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2012, 08:52:12 AM »
Quote from: MadSmith on February 17, 2012, 08:42:53 AM
There are, of course, logical limits to that as well.  For example, obscene pictures might get you in trouble at a range where there are children around.   :)

Might get you in trouble at the RANGE. But not with the gub'ment. LOL I was actually originally going to say "you could have a vagina for safe and a penis for fire if you wanted" but decided to make it more ridiculous with the beer/glass slipper 
« Last Edit: February 17, 2012, 08:54:16 AM by SPOProds-Sean O. »
Logged
"OCing with no active retention is unwise a.k.a. STUPID!"
"Hardware breaks, software doesn't, unless your brain runs on Windows."

Offline sikocycles

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 175
  • Keep the 2nd Amendment Alive.
Re: Safety selector Markings question?
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2012, 09:17:44 AM »
Great answers guys. 
Logged
  Go Up
« previous next »